Money laundering is usually described from the compliance seat: obligations, thresholds, reports. Peter Lilley describes it from the other direction — as an industry, with practitioners, service providers, competitive dynamics and a global infrastructure that exists because there is enormous demand for it.

That reframing is where the value of the book lies. Laundering is not so much a series of transactions to be caught as a professional sector serving criminal clients, and understanding it as a business is what makes its structures recognizable.

What the book actually covers

Lilley's scope is deliberately wide: the international infrastructure through which illicit proceeds are moved, cleaned and reintegrated, and the connections between organized crime, corruption and terrorist financing.

He is particularly strong on jurisdictions. Certain places have built genuine economic sectors around corporate secrecy, minimal beneficial ownership disclosure and cooperative formation regimes, and Lilley treats this as an industrial fact rather than a moral one. Understanding which jurisdictions serve which purposes in a structure is a practical diagnostic skill, and it is what allows an investigator to look at a corporate chain and form a view about its intent.

He is equally clear about professional enablers. Laundering at scale requires lawyers, accountants, company formation agents and bankers — some knowingly complicit, more of them willfully incurious, and the distinction matters less than people assume. The professional intermediary is a structural feature of any serious laundering operation, not an incidental participant.

The book covers how organized crime groups generate and launder their proceeds, including through cyber laundering, how terrorist financing works, the official response, and the preventive strategies open to business.

Written for a general professional audience rather than for investigators specifically, it is more readable than a manual and broader in scope.

Dirty Dealing, earlier-edition cover

Why it matters for your risk posture

Read it for the structural diagnostic. The single most useful skill in counterparty assessment is looking at a corporate structure and forming a view about why it was built that way. Lilley teaches the vocabulary — which jurisdictions, which intermediaries, which layering patterns serve which purposes — and that vocabulary is what converts an org chart into a finding.

Read it for the enabler problem, which is where institutional exposure usually sits. Most organizations that become entangled in laundering do so through professional intermediaries who were incurious rather than complicit. The distinction is legally significant and reputationally irrelevant, which is the risk.

Finally, read it as the strategic complement to the investigative manual. John Madinger's guide, covered here, teaches you how to trace. Lilley teaches you what you are looking at when you find it, and why that structure exists at all.

On Lilley’s account, a structure’s choice of jurisdictions says what it was built for. That is the working assumption in our asset searches and recovery support, where the route value took through formation agents, nominees and offshore vehicles indicates where it is likely to have come to rest. Reading the chain this way also shapes the cost-benefit advice a client needs before pursuing recovery. Some of the jurisdictions in it will cooperate with enforcement, and others were chosen precisely because they do not.

Key takeaways

  • Laundering is a service industry. It has practitioners, providers and competitive dynamics, and reading it as a sector makes its structures legible.
  • Jurisdiction choice is diagnostic. Structures are assembled deliberately, and which places appear in a chain tells you what the chain is for.
  • Professional enablers are structural. Lawyers, accountants and formation agents are features of serious laundering, and willful incuriosity is the most common posture.
  • Individual elements look unremarkable. The finding is almost always in the combination, not in any single transaction or entity.

About the author

Peter Lilley — not the politician of the same name — was, across the editions published between 2000 and 2006, a consultant and adviser on money laundering, financial crime and fraud, and wrote and spoke extensively on illicit finance.

Dirty Dealing: The Untold Truth about Global Money Laundering, International Crime and Terrorism was published by Kogan Page: a first edition in 2000 (under the shorter subtitle The Untold Truth about Global Money Laundering), a second in 2003, and a third and most recent edition in 2006, each updated as the typologies and the regulatory landscape shifted. The cover shown here is from an earlier edition. It is written for professionals across compliance, investigation and management rather than for specialists in any one of them.


Dirty Dealing, earlier-edition cover

Get the book

Dirty Dealing

Peter Lilley

Find it on Amazon

Also on Amazon UK · Amazon DE

Where the proceeds go

We donate 100% of what we earn to Children of Fallen Heroes

If you buy through the link above we may earn a small commission, at no extra cost to you. Every penny of it goes to Children of Fallen Heroes, a registered 501(c)(3). We keep none of it.

They are developing an 82-acre campus in Vass, North Carolina for the children of military families, first responders and foster youth — STEAM education in aviation, robotics and drones, alongside leadership and healing programs. Over eleven years their programs have reached more than 15,000 young people and families.

See their work

We participate in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program and similar affiliate programs; these relationships do not influence our recommendations. Cookies and similar technologies record interactions with affiliate links — see our Privacy Policy to disable them, or reach us via Contact.

Discover more Insights from Falcone International

In “On Intelligence,” the late John Hughes-Wilson organized the history of espionage around the intelligence cycle rather than around famous agents and operations, and argued that intelligence fails most often at the last step, when an accurate assessment has to reach someone with the authority to act on it.

Fraud is often reported to rise in a downturn. Targets stay where they were set, oversight thins as headcount falls, and the controls that quietly depended on somebody having spare time stop working. This piece sets out where exposure concentrates during a recession and which defenses actually hold.

Joel Brenner, a former NSA inspector general and head of US counterintelligence, argues in “Glass Houses” that cyber exposure is structural rather than a failure of controls: the networks that carry commercial, governmental and personal life were built for reachability, not confidentiality.

Counterparty risk is the exposure you take on from the people and organizations you transact with. It rarely announces itself, and most organizations price it at zero until the day they learn otherwise. This guide explains the term, then sets out a method for verifying a counterparty before and after signature.

Discover how we use our integrated capabilities for our clients

Case Studies and Client Stories